Historicizing the Global, or Labouring for Invention?
subrahma{at}history.ucla.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
This brief essay is intended to comment on Geoff Eleys essay Historicizing the Global, Politicizing Capital: Giving the Present a Name. It is in three parts. The first critically reviews some recent literature on economic aspects of globalization, focusing in particular on authors associated with the National Bureau for Economic Research (NBER). The second section poses the question of the relative absence of Asia – both China and India – in Eleys analysis, a remarkable blind spot of some dimensions. The final then looks at the question of the emergence of the global as an object of study for historians, here revisiting some of my own earlier work and that of the French historian Serge Gruzinski. In the space of a few pages, a critique is thus offered both of Eleys own Eurocentric prejudices and his narrowly presentist concerns.