Skip Navigation

History Workshop Journal 2009 68(1):199-221; doi:10.1093/hwj/dbp005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Waldman, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of History Workshop Journal, all rights reserved.

The Politics of History Teaching in England and France during the 1980s

Abby Waldman

alw58{at}cam.ac.uk


   Abstract

In the 1980s an unprecedented politicization of school history occurred in both England and France. For the two preceding decades ‘new’ history, which encouraged children’s active use of historical sources to study the past from a variety of perspectives, had gained popularity at the expense of more traditional methods which favoured pupils’ memorization of a national chronology heavily oriented towards key political and military events and personalities. The reaction against ‘new’ history in the 1980s was prompted by fears that its methods deprived children of the strong sense of national identity and pride which traditional school history had sought to instil. Both the Thatcherite ‘new right’ and Mitterrand’s Socialists therefore sought to restore traditional history in schools, but where the British ‘traditionalists’ were faced by opposition from teachers, the Department for Education and Science, the Inspectorate, numerous historians and the Labour Party, a political consensus on the need to restore chronological national history to its dominant place in the curriculum was quickly reached in France. This article proposes an explanation for this respective opposition and consensus, focusing in particular on traditions of governance in education and curriculum control, and on the impact of dominant British and French discourses on the relationship between schooling and citizenship, ethnic diversity and national identity.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.