Skip Navigation

History Workshop Journal 2009 67(1):99-110; doi:10.1093/hwj/dbn050
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhattacharya, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of History Workshop Journal, all rights reserved.

Teaching History in Schools: the Politics of Textbooks in India

Neeladri Bhattacharya

Email: neeladri1{at}gmail.com


   Abstract

Within a decade after Independence, some of the finest historians in India got involved in writing new history textbooks for school children. As a new India began to dust off its colonial legacy, many historians felt the need to critique colonial perceptions of the past, rethink existing narratives of history, and develop a secular national imagination. Horrified by the violence of Partition, when thousands of Hindus and Muslims killed each other and many more left their homes in search of new places to live, historians turned to the past to build the premises of a humane and secular society. They questioned communal assumptions, critiqued sectarian stereotypes, and wrote secular histories for the children of the new independent nation.

The secular-nationalist textbooks that were produced in the 1960s and 1970s were immediately attacked by the Hindu right, and for the subsequent three decades history textbooks became the site for a larger battle between secularism and communalism in India. The defence of these textbooks was seen as synonymous with the fight against anti-secular forces, and suggestions for any form of change inevitably provoked suspicion.

Yet over these years, historians in India, as elsewhere, were opening their minds to new ideas, and posing issues in new ways. Gender histories made historians aware that all narratives need to be gendered; ecological histories made them see that that social lives are shaped by environment just as much as nature is transformed through human activity; cultural histories emphasized the importance of cultures in shaping people’s beliefs, perceptions and visions, even as people sought to make their own world of meanings. Histories from below and subaltern studies urged everyone to relocate the subjects of their enquiry, and see how subordinate groups make sense of their experience and constitute their lives. Critical theories stressed the need to rethink the words and terms through which the past was grasped and the tropes within which historical narratives were cast. Yet, till recently, none of these shifts in thinking about history was reflected in the textbooks that children read.

This essay emphasizes that school textbooks need not be insulated from the critical traditions of our times. When conceptions of history change, when the past is looked at in new ways, should these ideas remain the preserve of academics alone? Focusing on the new set of history textbooks recently produced in India, the essay discusses what these new books seek to do, what pedagogic ideas underline their production, and how they differ from earlier textbooks.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.