Skip Navigation

History Workshop Journal 2007 64(1):200-211; doi:10.1093/hwj/dbm031
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prior, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of History Workshop Journal, all rights reserved.

Commemorating Slavery 2007: a Personal View from Inside the Museums

Katherine Prior

katherine.prior{at}talktalk.net


   Abstract

Attempts by museums to commemorate the 200th anniversary in 2007 of Britain's outlawing of the international slave-trade have highlighted a number of cognitive gaps in the relationship between museums and academic specialists on slavery. In particular, the ability of many academics to provide advice to exhibition curators and outreach workers is compromised by their lack of exposure to the attitudes and information levels of the public. Understanding about how museums communicate with the public is also poor, which often results in university-based scholars viewing a museum’s exhibition on their subject specialization as a ‘dumbed-down’ form of communication. More frequent engagement between academics and museums may speed up the transfer of ideas from the university environment to the public.

The museum activities in 2007 have also revealed that transatlantic slavery and African-Caribbean history in general are not yet considered a normal or ordinary part of a British museum's brief. The perceived difficulties of mounting exhibitions or planning ancillary events on these topics lead to a ‘curating by committee’ approach which undermines bold and imaginative treatments and waters down direct language. These problems appear to be magnified for 'blockbuster' exhibitions involving large amounts of public funding, suggesting that in future scarce resources would be better directed towards smaller, more focused projects.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.