Skip Navigation

History Workshop Journal 2006 61(1):171-182; doi:10.1093/hwj/dbi059
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walter, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of History Workshop Journal, all rights reserved.

The English People and the English Revolution Revisited

John Walter

John Walter teaches history at the University of Essex and works on early modern popular political culture and on the history of food. He is the author of various articles on early modern crowds and of Understanding Popular Violence in the English Revolution: the Colchester Plunderers, Cambridge, 1999 and co-editor (with Roger Schofield) of Famine, Disease and the Social Order in Early Modern Society, Cambridge, 1989, and (with Michael Braddick) of Negotiating Power in Early Modern Society: Order, Hierarchy and Subordination in Britain and Ireland, Cambridge, 2001. He is preparing a monograph on the impact of the Protestation oath on popular political culture in the English revolution.

Correspondence: jwalter{at}essex.ac.uk

This article revisits the question of the popular role in the English revolution. Surveying crowd actions, it argues for the existence of a pre-revolutionary popular political culture and the need to re-examine popular roles in the Revolution in the light of this pre-existing culture. Before the Revolution, the deep structures of the English state had created the need for a political dialogue between ruler and subject which allowed the people to claim legitimation for a political agency otherwise denied them in a culture of obedience. The new political space created by the Revolution enlarged the scope for that agency. Focusing on developments in the early 1640s, the article argues for the temporary emergence of a citizenry of free-born Englishmen (and, for some, free-born women). It calls for a marriage of political history with the research strategy and sources of social and cultural history to create ‘a new political history’ which can explore the contours of participation, rejection and exclusion from that culture.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.