Skip Navigation

History Workshop Journal 2006 61(1):135-152; doi:10.1093/hwj/dbi050
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Strange, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of History Workshop Journal, all rights reserved.

The ‘Shock’ of Torture: a Historiographical Challenge

Carolyn Strange

Carolyn Strange has published on the history of criminal justice in Canada, the US and Australia. Her books include Qualities of Mercy: Justice, Punishment and Discretion (ed.) and Isolation: Places and Practices of Exclusion (ed. with Alison Bashford). With colleagues she conducted a study of prison history tourism, focusing on Port Arthur, Alcatraz and Robben Island. She is Director of Graduate Studies at the Centre for Cross-Cultural Research, Australian National University, where she convened a multi-disciplinary conference on ‘Pain and Death: Politics, Aesthetics, Legalities’. She remains an adjunct professor of Criminology and History at the University of Toronto.

Correspondence: carolyn.strange{at}anu.edu.au

When images of abusive and sexually-degrading behaviour by United States and British troops circulated globally in 2004 and 2005, leaders of the ‘war on terror’ expressed deep shock, then enlisted military justice to assign responsibility to rogue soldiers. Many on the Left have criticized such action and argued that torture enacts racist neo-colonialism, unleashed in the wake of the 9-11 attacks. Few critics apply a wider historical frame of reference, however.

Historians have written extensively about torture in totalitarian regimes, former colonies, and the distant past of ‘horrible history’ yet our analyses of the recent history of physical abuse in liberal democracies remain rare. Debate over the apparent resurgence of torture would benefit from deeper historical knowledge and understanding of the body as an object of pain, humiliation, and death – not in foreign wars and military operations, but in the context of domestic, civil punishment, where determining the limits of sanctioned violence, rather than removing violence from penal repertoires, has been a matter of persistent deliberation in modern democracies. If the critically engaged historian's special burden is to keep present the pasts we prefer to forget, we might do more to shift the West's ‘shock’ into the nagging pain of self-knowledge.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.