Skip Navigation

History Workshop Journal 2001 2001(51):19-36; doi:10.1093/hwj/2001.51.19
© 2001 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gere, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Williams Harvey's Weak Experiment: the Archaeology of an Anecdote

Cathy Gere1

1 University of Cambridge, Cambridge

William Harvey's Weak Experiment: the archaeology of an anecdote' examines an anonymous seventeenth century manuscript, published in the Gentleman's Magazine in 1832, that recounts a story about Dr William Harvey. The manuscript describes how the discoverer of the circulation of the blood, during a sojourn in Newmarket with his patron King Charles I, disguised himself one day as a wizard and set off for a lone house on the borders of Newmarket Heath said to be the residence of the local witch. Harvey's disguise was successful and, upon being asked inside, he requested to meet the witch's ‘familiar’. After being introduced to her tame toad, Harvey sent the witch off with a shilling to buy some ale so that he could open up the belly of the toad with his scalpel, in order to prove that it was not a ‘familiar’ but just an ‘arrant natural toad’. This anecdote has achieved some modest fame as a neat parable of the early modern triumph of science over superstition. By identifying for the first time the manuscript's author and intended audience, placing the story and its teller into the context of Restoration intellectual life, and giving the whole manuscript a close reading, this paper attempts a revisionist account of the story' significance.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.