Skip Navigation

History Workshop Journal 2000 2000(50):1-21; doi:10.1093/hwj/2000.50.1
© 2000 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stuurman, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

François Bernier and the Invention of Racial Classification

Siep Stuurman1

1 Erasmus University, Rotterdam

The article discusses the first attempt at a racial classification of the world's population, framed by the seventeenth-century French traveller, physician and Gassendist philosopher François Bernier. His classification of humanity into races or `species' is in some respects a typically seventeenth-century anthropological essay; in other respects it anticipates the eighteenth-century genre of the natural history of mankind. Overall, it is best characterized as an intellectual experiment, a try-out of a new mode of discussing human variety. The historical significance of Bernier's discourse on race lies precisely in its transitional nature.

Stuurman discusses Bernier's racial classification in the context of his own philosophical and ethnographic thought, then situates it in the larger intellectual transitions of the late seventeenth century. The idea of racial classification as the new foundation for a `division of the world' was ushered in by four factors, two negative and two positive. The negative factors were, first, the loss of intellectual credibility for sacred history as an explanatory framework for the history of humanity; and second, the impasse of Renaissance cosmography with its kaleidoscopic multiplication of ever more nations and tribes. The positive factors were, first, the empirical turn of Gassendist philosophy which partly bridged the gap between the biological and the mental, and also cleared the way for a synthesis between abstract, `theoretical' equality and a pragmatic, empiricist appreciation of differential rationality; and second, the new spirit of classification manifested in all areas of empirical inquiry from Bacon onwards, especially powerful in natural history during the closing decades of the seventeenth century.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.